This Day In History – Red Sox Propose New Fenway Park
15 May 1999 – On this day nine years ago, Red Sox ownership, led by CEO John Harrington, announces plans to replace 87-year-old Fenway Park with a brand-new complex that features near-identical dimensions across Yawkey Way by 2003; however, plans never got off the ground and new ownership announced the abandonment of any such plan in 2005. The design was to have followed in the spirit of retro-style ballparks like Camden Yards in Baltimore and Jacobs Field in Cleveland, while the old ballpark would have seen new development built in place of what is now center field, the bleachers, and first-base side of the ballpark. However, plans also including turning part of the old Fenway Park into a baseball museum and park. The new plan would also have allowed construction of the new park to take place as the Red Sox played their final games in its historic ball yard.
Ownership claimed that with the current structure, the Red Sox would be unable to stay competitive as player salaries increased; the new stadium, which would be financed by the team, would include 10,000 more seats including luxury boxes and premium seats. All the team asked in return from the state was improvement to the local infrastructure, such as the building of parking garages and improved transportation. However, city, county, and state legislators balked at the idea and, after the sale of the team by the JR Yawkey ownership group in 2002, the idea was scraped as the new ownership, led by John Henry, Tom Werner, and Larry Lucchino, instead poured money into renovations, such as expanded concourses, added bathroom facilities and concessions, and innovations such as the Monster Seats and Conigliaro’s corner that have added close to 6,000 seats to bring the park’s present capacity to just under 40,000. In March of 2005, all plans for a new facility in the foreseeable future were abandoned as the club announced their commitment to remain at Fenway.
Image of New Fenway Park courtesy of Ballparks.com
Tags: Boston Red Sox, Fenway Park
In regard to the May 15 post, “…All the team asked in return from the state was improvement to the local infrastructure, such as the building of parking garages and improved transportation…” Actually, the team was expecting more than $350 million of handouts…free land adjacent to Fenway taken from other owners by eminent domain, clearing of that land, and the building of parking garages by the city with the team keeping the fees. It was too much to ask for, and when the team could not secure loans for the balance, the decision to sell was made. Staying put has not proved to be the death-knell for the team or the ballpark, as was predicted.
Thank you.
Comment by E Tarlin — 27 May 2008 @ 8:33 PM
Thanks for the clarification – you’re correct, the team was looking for “freebies” especially in the form of properties that they did not own. In hindsight, staying at Fenway Park has been a boon to the team; ownership has been able to make improvements to baseball’s oldest ballpark and, using other revenue streams, remain competitive, winning two championships in six-plus seasons.
On that note, I offer my tip of the cap to Save Fenway Park! for its efforts over the past ten years!
Comment by FenFan — 28 May 2008 @ 8:55 AM
Why can`t you start making the new stadium now? Its not like you don`t have room in Boston. When I went to Fenway park it felt like it was going to collapse. When I went to Wrigley feild it didn`t fell like it was going to collapse and it is the second oldest stadium.
Comment by Ali — 21 February 2009 @ 10:04 AM
There will be no new stadium. Ten or twenty years ago, the argument could have been made that the stadium was in disrepair (not quite on the verge of collapse, however). If you have been anytime in the past five to six years, you would know that vast improvements have been made to Fenway Park and there is no need to even consider a new one, especially given the state of the current economy and the fact that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has historically objected to public funding of professional stadiums.
Comment by FenFan — 21 February 2009 @ 3:41 PM